JJB
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
7,417
Threads:
161
|
|
I think I got it, do you want the answers yet?
Gardening is an excuse not to do housework
Greetings from Salisbury
Qualified member of the Confused Nutter's Club
|
Veggie
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
14,422
Threads:
604
|
|
Yes, I couldn't do it - apart from by guesswork!
The Moneyless Chicken says:-
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
|
JJB
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
7,417
Threads:
161
|
|
08-10-2021, 10:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-10-2021, 10:48 AM by JJB.)
I didn't use a formula.......come on! I'm not that clever. More trial and error, common sense and winging it.
I bet the Boss, Pros or Mark will stun us with a formula
Gardening is an excuse not to do housework
Greetings from Salisbury
Qualified member of the Confused Nutter's Club
|
MartinH
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
425
Threads:
5
|
|
I thought I'd try a few examples before trying to get a formula. I realised from the question that either both digits (of Tom or Meg's age) were odd or both even, and that the sum of the digits had to be divisible by 3, which was enough to stumble on a correct answer almost immediately. I found another one just now, so maybe there are more.
|
Mark_Riga
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
1,780
Threads:
38
|
|
I think there are quite a few answers really:
If you assume Meg is younger than Tom them Meg is 33 or 66 and Ed is 11 or 22.
If Meg is 33 then Tom is 55, 77 or 99 ; Phil is 11, 22 or 33 respectively
If Meg is 66 then Tom is 88 ; Phil is 11
If Meg is older, you get few more combinations.
|
MartinH
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
425
Threads:
5
|
|
Mark has read the question differently from me. My first answer was Tom 15, Meg 51, Phil 18 and Ed 17.
Second answer was 24, 42, 9, 14.
Have I misunderstood?
|
Veggie
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
14,422
Threads:
604
|
|
(08-10-2021, 06:56 PM)Mark_Riga Wrote: I think there are quite a few answers really:
If you assume Meg is younger than Tom them Meg is 33 or 66 and Ed is 11 or 22.
If Meg is 33 then Tom is 55, 77 or 99 ; Phil is 11, 22 or 33 respectively
If Meg is 66 then Tom is 88 ; Phil is 11
If Meg is older, you get few more combinations. Dare I say - I think your assumption that Meg & Tom's ages are duplicate numbers like 33, 55 etc is not what is meant by the statement:-
Tom & Meg's ages are the same with the digits reversed.
Its more like 23 & 32.
The Moneyless Chicken says:-
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
|
Veggie
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
14,422
Threads:
604
|
|
(08-10-2021, 07:01 PM)MartinH Wrote: Mark has read the question differently from me. My first answer was Tom 15, Meg 51, Phil 18 and Ed 17.
Second answer was 24, 42, 9, 14.
Have I misunderstood? Neither of these are the answer on my Puzzle Pad.
The Moneyless Chicken says:-
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
|
Proserpina
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
791
Threads:
18
|
|
I can also get multiple combinations that work for this one, using similar logic to Martin. And there would be even more if, for example, Phil could be four and a half rather than a whole number!
I feel like it's either a trick question (why "How old is everyone?" and not "...are each of these people?") or there's some key information that's missing or I've failed to infer.
Formerly self-contained, but expanding my gardening horizons beyond pots!
|
JJB
Joined:
May 2020
Posts:
7,417
Threads:
161
|
|
I reckon
Tom 51
Meg 15
Phil 18
Ed 5
Gardening is an excuse not to do housework
Greetings from Salisbury
Qualified member of the Confused Nutter's Club
|