| #8 |
(27-03-2021, 08:05 AM)Small chilli Wrote: Surly most plants are good for the environment! No plants means no pollinators, no pollinators, means no plants and no bigger beasties that feed on the plants and / or the pollinators and so on.That's my thoughts too, SC. Plants absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen to enable us to breathe - that sounds good to me.
Obviously there’s a few exceptions to this rule. The one that springs to mind is rhododendron. Supports very little insect life & poisons the ground it grows in.
Have I over simplified things again?
We wouldn't survive in a world without plants.
The RHS article that Spec refers to is https://www.rhs.org.uk/science/articles/...r6fZizFHAY
The Moneyless Chicken says:-
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
![[-]](https://gardenandgossip.org/images/zen/collapse.png)